Photography

Interview with Wolfgang Tillmans : “You art is only as interesting as your thoughts are”

From blissful techno parties scenes ender to tender bits of bodies and intimate portraits of contemporary figures, like Frank Ocean on the cover of his Blonde album (2016), Wolfgang Tillmans has become one of the most famous names in contemporary photography. For his latest show at Chantal Crousel gallery, where he unveiled new works made during the past 8 years including the pandemic, the German 52-year-old met with Numéro.

Wolfgang Tillmans knows how to use image like no other to speak about our times. For three decades now, the German artist has never stopped exploring the corners of the sensitive world as a photographer but also as a musician, curator and activist, constantly finding new ways to marvel at its beauty. Berlin techno nights’ sweaty underground atmosphere, youth and fresh naked bodies inhabiting German forests, tender bits of skin caught in a bedroom and even faces of the people who embody the zeitgeist, be them famous or anonymous – he photographed them all. Used to capturing portraits and bodies, the artist also experimented through projects that could be qualified as more “pictorial”. After starting his Silvers series – analog prints stained thanks to chemical reactions – during the 90s, he created his Freischswimmer (litterally “free swimmers”) during the 2000s, colored cloudy and abstract landscapes that were born thanks to light techniques in the darkroom.


In his latest solo exhibition at Chantal Crousel gallery, Wolfgang Tillmans once again showcases a very neat and precise project. His work, an ongoing infinite material he is constantly exploring and rearranging, expands there with new pictures he made during the past 8 years, including the pandemic. Here, the artist produced them in many different formats : some of them become 6 by 9 feet prints he pins on the wall, while framing others or developing them on small-sized photo paper before taping them to the wall, making the visitor getting closer and further constantly. Tillmans also plays with scales inside the pictures themselves, going from a city’s nocturnal skyview to details of a blue butterfly tatooed on an anonymous skin, even including his own self-portrait through a smartphone’s screen. Human body is always here in his photographs, even when physically absent, like in folded Adidas red shorts or dry sweat traces on a black tee-shirt, but we can also guess it behind ripe avocados, which have been delicately placed on white bedsheets. Going way beyond traditional still lives, Wolfgang Tillmans’ works are, indeed, filled with life. The German artist gave Numéro a photography lesson, while assuming the upcoming transformations of images and languages.

 

 

Numéro : How have you chosen the works in this new show?

Wolfgang Tillmans : There isn’t a clear narrative, nor a clear connection of subject matters even though they are distinct, but I think what unites all the works is that hey speak to senses and states of being – liquid, solid states, the softness of tissue or skin, hardness of bones under the skin and trees... Because we have been sensorily deprived or sensorily overloaded in certain areas for more than one year now, works touch things on different level, responding to this deprivation or saturation. Of course, the center of the works is the body, which appears in the self portraits, in the FaceTime moments, in the clothes reflecting the three-dimensional silhouette that they cover… Everything feels connected by a desire to make new pictures. Even though certains things are recurring subject matters, I always feel moved to take a new version of a previous subject if I feel there is something new I can add to it, like that drapery of a tee-shirt with salt on it, which is something I haven’t seen before – the physicality being inscribed in such a direct way, the liquid suddenly printed on the fabric. And there are these four large scale non-figurative pictures, the Silvers, which are actually very figurative. We could see Japanese landscapes there, for instance.

 

 

Don’t you see them as abstract works?
The word abstract is a funny one as it is misused all the time. For instance, Vincent Van Gogh’s Sunflowers are abstraction of sunflowers : in real life, the actual flowers don’t look like how Van Gogh painted them, but he made an abstraction of them. In my Silver series, you have a solid surface of blue pigments and traces of chemicals, which is all very concrete.  These pictures are no abstractions of the sky but products of their own making, they are not representing anything else than their own process, made of some photochemical reactions gone wrong. But you could also see a swimming pool in that.

Wolfgang Tillmans, “Silver 209” (2014). Courtoisie de l'artiste et de la | Courtesy of the artist and Galerie Chantal Crousel, Paris. Photo: Aurélien Mole.

Wolfgang Tillmans, “Remy at Spectrum” (2015). Courtoisie de l'artiste et de la | Courtesy of the artist and Galerie Chantal Crousel, Paris. Photo: Aurélien Mole.

Many artists make one project and then move on to the next. Your body of work is like an infinite artistic material that you can revisit and remodel every time you display it in exhibitions or in books. Aren’t you sometimes scared by its never-ending potential?

Potentially, yes, because you can never be sure of that not happening, but not for now. Artists are often afraid to not look like their time, or that their work would becomie outdated. That is a risk that you don’t have to take, because there is no guarantee you can look into the future and predict what is going to be timeless and what is not. I never felt that fear. In this exhibition, for instance, 95% are new works from recent years, and there are four pictures from 1991 or 1992 : the picture of the back with a hand on top of it is actually thirty years old!

 

 

I thought it was one of the newer ones!

Exactly, and it’s not a photograph I could have done 15 years ago. Looking at time, there are pictures I made 30 years ago that seamlessly could be from today. Next to it, the other picture of a naked back is vey recent, and they are standing next to each other while being 25 years apart. That is the experiment in this exhibition : all the works seem new, but they are not. At the moment, I am also working on my retrospective exhibition at the MoMA [to take place in 2022], so since lockdown I have been revisiting which works I want to show, went through my archive and rediscovered other works. Maybe the pool of my practice is very wide and infinite, but each composition is very specific. At the Chantal Crousel gallery, when you look at my works it in a very zoomed out way, you can say “this is three times Tillmans”, but when you zoom in you notice their big differences. That’s the challenge which I don’t tire of, but it’s hard to make it new every time.

 

 

“My primary goal is that my pictures should depict what it feels like to look through my eyes.”

 

 

We have a spontaneous tendency to think of photography as a very flat and bidimensional medium, but I think your visual work has always been very physical. The living experience of space is so central to your photographic work, as well as your performances or your music. How have you adapted to the digital shift of this past year, if so?
I have not ventured much into digital exhibitions last year, even though there were considerable invitations to do so. Many people have made fun of online viewing rooms, but I'm not that cynical : they really are pdfs that you look at. If you look at my website, I have been updating my online viewing room for years, showing how I installed my work in every exhibition of the last decade. To this day, these platforms stay the nearest experience to discover something when you can’t move there. The pandemic has highlighted that, but to show what I’ve been doing on four continents in the last decade is something that can only be communicated by photographing space. That, in itself, is a language.

Wolfgang Tillmans, “James’s Spine” (2016). Courtoisie de l'artiste et de la | Courtesy of the artist and Galerie Chantal Crousel, Paris. © Wolfgang Tillmans.

You recently gave an interview on France Culture, where you mentioned how fascinated you still were with the magic of photography, especially analog, and its ability to make the picture appear on paper. How has your relationship with photography changed over the past thirty years, and with the emergence of new means and media?

There is an ongoing negotiation inside of me between the shutter speed of the photograph, the resolution of the film and the light conditions. They are three contradictory graphs that work all against each other: the longer the shutter speed is, the more you are likely to shake the camera and create a blur in the picture; in order to reduce it you can open the lens, the aperture, but you decrease the depth of film; or you can increase the speed of the film by increasing the ISO, which makes the picture grainy. Instead of setting on only one mode and working with a tripod, I am constantly finding myself exploring the limits in a way or another. For example, the concrete columns I show in the exhibition are very extreme digital photographs in the way they are taken with an 8000/second exposure time and a 3200 ISO, which we couldn't use without making the picture unreadable. Technology has always sparked an interest in me. For instance I was one of the first photographers to use inkjet printing at the beginning of the nineties, because I loved the texture of the ink on the paper with no glass. I always felt the fine grain film was just enough to represent what it felt like to look at the world through an eye. When the new digital cameras came out in the late 2000s, I really had to learn a new language, which was sharper that what the eye could see. That was a very seismic shift.

 

 

“There really isn’t a bad camera, there are only cameras”

 

 

I saw you outside earlier, taking pictures of your assistant with your phone. If we look at your Instagram, you don’t seem to create hierarchies between techniques and tools to make photography. Do you also print, show and sell your smartphone pictures?

You know, there really isn’t a bad camera, there are only cameras. It’s only bad when it goes against your expectation, what you hope the camera can do. When the camera is as flat as a matchbox, like a smartphone’s, you cannot expect to have a great depth of field play. Primarily, my goal is that my pictures should depict what it feels like to look through my eyes : at first, I did that with a 100 ISO fine grain film, and then after 2010 I gradually realized that this hyper-focus of the new cameras has grown with general HD-ness of life. Now you can zoom into everything.

 

 

Indeed, children that were born after 2010 have that instinctive reflex of zooming into pictures with their hands!

And they have no awareness of  what that means, technologically! In the last years, some of my photographs I was actually only able to make because of the smartphone camera. In the show, there are three of them. I don’t make a big gesture about it, but it does somehow represent my reality, and I feel it’s artificial to say that these can’t be artworks. Though I always assume that people understand that I don’t see the pictures I post on my Instagram as artworks. They are more like “photographs as a language”.

 

 

Your Instagram is indeed very reflective of you as an artist, even though we don’t see a lot of the actual works you show in exhibitions. We are getting a glance at your universe, and there are also articles and long texts that really express your opinions and political views. But would you ever print and frame that?
In some instances, yes, but it’s very rare. I wrote a photo essay in Aperture magazine, with the title “Are photographs words?”. I had this feeling that we are really at a pivotal moment in history, where we are transitioning potentially to a time where there is a pictorial language just the way that we have words. Over the past 2-3 years, we have started to use pictures, at first as a joke, but now we are expressing very complex emotions through pictures, pictograms or emojis. Again, it’s always a little bit touchy to speak about these things in interviews because it sounds like old men with beards asking: “do you remember when the phones weren’t there?” (Laughs). But I have a feeling things are up to a change.

Wolfgang Tillmans, “Lüneburg (self)” (2020). Courtoisie de l'artiste et de la | Courtesy of the artist and Galerie Chantal Crousel, Paris. © Wolfgang Tillmans.

I find it very difficult to describe your pictures in the sense that they seem to specifically speak about one cannot say with words. Still, you use words quite frequently and also write your own lyrics for your songs. Do you find it easier to express yourself with words?
Certainly not, otherwise I wouldn’t have started making pictures. If one only describes my pictures by what is on them, one does not really describe why they are special. Are they really special because there is a person sitting by a table in a room? Of course not because of that, but because of the “how”. This “how” is evading words, and is the frustration many artists have. In painting, over hundreds of years, the language has evolved to describe the texture, what is happening in these centimeters of paint, the canvas, the modulation. In photography, it’s a particular problem as people are still stuck with about four adjectives, like “blurred” or “focused”, which are not describing why one can recognize some photographers from a mile away. Interestingly though, language has somehow interested me all along.

 

 

“The good thing about photography is that an interesting thought can be potentially realized in a second.”

 

 

But you are also very invested in writing your own music!

Yes. During the last six years or so, I may have gathered a feeling of urgency to use more of a performative language, which was kind of where I started in my late teens. I wrote like a hundred lyrics, and somehow, it also moved behind the camera. I also see the exhibitioners as performers: their work is indeed the result of moving around the space.


 

How do you manage to stay inspired with everything that you do?

With the music and the political campaigns, during the last 5 years I found that these new areas were not detracting from photography. They were actually keeping me inspired and taking time away from my practice, rather that sitting and thinking about what I should do next with the camera. All of this allows me to think about other things, just like teaching which I did in Frankfurt from 2003 to 2009, curating exhibitions in my space Between Bridges [exhibition space Tillmans opened in 2006 in Berlin], where I see these 3 days a month thinking about other people’s works as something that keeps things moving. The good thing about photography is that an interesting thought can be potentially realized in a second. You art is really only as interesting as your thoughts are, and not necessarily your ideas. As long as I stay genuinely interested in the world, in life, in people and people’s art, I feel like I am okay.

Vue d'installation “Wolfgang Tillmans, Lumière du matin”, Galerie Chantal Crousel, Paris, France (06/05 — 12/06/21). Courtoisie de l'artiste et de la | Courtesy of the artist and Galerie Chantal Crousel, Paris. Photo: Martin Argyroglo.
  • How photographer Nadia Lee Cohen shakes up our vision of women

    For six years, Nadia Lee Cohen has photographed dozens of models and built up a rich visual narrative following a unique guide line : the contemporary expression of femininity. These movie-like set up photographs, which have been assembled all together in a book entitled “Woman“, recently published by IDEA, all foil female archetypes through a quirky look, celebrating the diversity of all bodies, ages and gender. For Numéro, the British photographer goes back to her project.

  • Photographer Hiroshi Sugimoto unveils his first coloured works' secrets

    For fifteen years, Japanese major photographer Hiroshi Sugimoto has been exploring a new side to his practice : colour. Inspired by an Isaac Newton's theory, the 73-year-old man uses light to project hues in their purest essence, which on Polaroid films create abstracts landscapes fit for contemplation. For Numéro, the artist comments on his latest series “Opticks”, currently shown by the Marian Goodman Gallery in Paris. 

  • Photojournalist Mary Ellen Mark in 5 cult images

    Steidl publishers are dedicating a very beautiful book to the American journalist Mary Ellen Mark (1940-2015), who worked for years with the prestigious Magnum agency, probing the darkest corners of society, from the bedrooms of prostitutes in Bombay to the meetings of the Ku Klux Klan and the film set of "Apocalypse Now". Six hundred of her best shots can now be found in "The Book of Everything", edited by the photographer's own husband. Raw, often provocative Numéro tells the story behind the images.

  • Khalik Allah and the somptuous drug addicts of Harlem

    Since the age of 14, this video artist and photographer, today a member of the prestigious photo agency Magnum, has been walking the streets of Harlem and Brooklyn with his camera, capturing the raw reality of New York’s most disadvantaged populations.

  • From Patti Smith to Metllalica, Gabriele Moratti photographs legendary rockstars

    Definite rock lover, Redemption's creative director Gabriele Moratti photographed his idols, from Patti Smith to Neil Young or Metallica, during their most memorable concerts. A series he unveils exclusively for Numéro.

  • The biggest music stars photographed by Hedi Slimane

    Passionate observer of the rock scene, which he captures in his striking photographs, famous designer Hedi Slimane is as respected in the musical industry as he is in the fashion one, which he has been reigning over for twenty years. For Numéro, Celine's creative director unveils an exclusive portbfolio of his most beautiful black and white portraits of great music stars, from Lady Gaga to Kim Gordon by way of Pete Doherty.

  • Johnny Depp, Charlotte Gainsbourg and The Blaze under the lens of Jean-Baptiste Mondino

    Inspired by the unique musical talents of our time, great French photographer and filmmaker Jean-Baptiste Mondino pieces together an iconography where each one's personality and originality shines through. Here, this faithful Numéro friend unveils an exclusive portfolio including the most fascinating minds of today, among which we can find Johnny Depp, Charlotte Gainsbourg, The Blaze or Christine and the Queens. 

  • Lao Xie Xie's reckless provocations

    The mysterious Chinese photographer Lao Xie Xie (“Mr Thank-you” who might be a woman) immortalises moments of life with a complete loathing for perfection. Evoking desire, pleasure and food, the artist’s reasoning works backwards with photography allowing him to shape what he is incapable of mentally constructing.

  • The smouldering Helmut Newton as seen by the women who knew him, in a new documentary

    As we celebrate the centenary of his birth, Germano-Australian photographer Helmut Newton is being honoured in the first posthumous documentary on his subject. Entitled “The Bad and the Beautiful”, this film which has already been released in Germany, delivers previously unseen accounts - all from women - on the work of this great master of the nude and smouldering voyeurism.

  • Gregory Prescott in 15 aquatic nudes

    Based in Los Angeles, the photographer Gregory Prescott turns bodies into his artwork. Armed with his camera, he captures sculpted, vibrant and radiant figures, and highlights their angles. Carnal textures, broad shoulders, curved backs… the American photographer immortalizes the grace and passion that take hold of moving female and male bodies. Either on large stretches of sand and sky, or down in the depths of the waters, Gregory Prescott enhances his models’ nudity and diversity. Throwbacks to 15 of the photographer’s aquatic nudes. 

  • Alison Jackson’s fake press settings

    No celebrities have been harmed during these shoots. In order to photograph Elizabeth II on the throne, Madonna ironing or Mick Jagger having collagen injected into his lips, Alison Jackson simply uses their look-alikes. Her resulting images are an investigation into our fascination for stolen snapshots.

  • Farid Shukurov, the magician of Photoshop

    Farid Shukurov calls himself “the magician of Photoshop”. And indeed, the young artist from Azerbaijan – @freds_gallery on Instagram –, has built a bewitching visual world with a vintage and colored touch, which sometimes reminds of Andy Warhol and pop comics from the 70s. Discover 11 of his most beautiful pictures.